<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 18&#215;50 IS Binoculars Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imagestabilizedbinoculars.net/canon-18x50-is.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imagestabilizedbinoculars.net/canon-18x50-is.htm</link>
	<description>Reviews and ratings of the best binoculars with optical stabilization and other random bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bluhm</title>
		<link>http://www.imagestabilizedbinoculars.net/canon-18x50-is.htm/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bluhm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smackdown.tv/?p=1194#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I purchased these and tried to like them.  Great price but I just was not happy with the image stabilization.  It was weird.  The me, the image was not clear.  It had a strange graininess about it.  I returned them.

I&#039;m still searching and I appreciate your input.  I was going to try the Zeiss 20 60 but you say that the is of the canon is better!  I guess I&#039;m just not ready to make a move yet.  Keep up the good work!

Most sincerely, 

Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased these and tried to like them.  Great <a title="price" href="http://www.imagestabilizedbinoculars.net/buy-best-binoculars.htm">price</a> but I just was not happy with the image stabilization.  It was weird.  The me, the image was not clear.  It had a strange graininess about it.  I returned them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still searching and I appreciate your input.  I was going to try the <a title="Zeiss" href="http://www.imagestabilizedbinoculars.net/zeiss">Zeiss</a> 20 60 but you say that the is of the canon is better!  I guess I&#8217;m just not ready to make a move yet.  Keep up the good work!</p>
<p>Most sincerely, </p>
<p>Jack</p>
<div class='myrp_boxes myrp_comment_helpful' id='myrp_23_helpful'>Was this review useful to you? <a href='javascript:myrp_cast_helpful(23, true);'>Yes</a> &nbsp; <a href='javascript:myrp_cast_helpful(23, false);'>No</a></div>
<p>
<div class='myrp_boxes myrp_comment_helpful_outcome' id='myrp_23_helpful_outcome'>18 / 20 found this review useful.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
